Two characters explain it, over gameplay.
Give it a topic. EggClip writes the argument, casts both speakers, puts the checkable claims on cards above them and lands every caption on the word being said.
150 credits on signup · no card · about three 90-second reels
One reel, and it's not a narrated one.
A real render from the demo workspace. Two keyed speakers standing over a looping bed, with the claim card above them. None of the narrated formats on this site look like it, which is why this is the clip you get rather than one of theirs.
2 speakers, each with their own voice
90 sec the length this format is tuned to
7 caption preset families
42 credits for a 90-second reel
It writes an argument, not a narration.
One character says the wrong thing the viewer is currently thinking, and the other goes one real mechanism deeper. The claims that survive checking go on the cards above their heads.
You bring
makes the other 5
one 9:16 reel, posted now or from the calendar
You read the conversation before anything renders, and a failed render refunds itself.
- Input
- a topic or a question. This lane writes the dialogue itself, so there's no script to bring
- Cast
- two characters, keyed out and standing across the lower part of the frame
- Voices
- one per character, carried by the character rather than picked per project
- Background
- a looping gameplay bed, which is why the lane locks its media type
- Captions
- word-timed, in the stripe between the cast and the card, in any of seven preset families
- Music
- off by default, because a bed under two speaking characters muddies both
- Grounding
- on. Claims get checked, and the ones that survive go on the evidence cards
- Review
- the conversation is approved before anything renders, and this gate can't be switched off
- Length
- tuned to about 90 seconds, which is where the format's own reference corpus sits
- Cost
- 42 credits for a 90-second reel, whichever visual tier you pick
- Publish
- YouTube and Instagram, immediately or from the content calendar
Four topics with a wrong idea worth correcting.
This lane wants a question, not a brief. The best ones have a popular answer that falls apart when you push on it.
Questions people ask first.
Do I write the dialogue?
No. You give it a topic and it writes the argument. You do read the conversation before anything renders, and that gate can't be turned off on this lane.
Why can't I turn the review off?
Because approving the conversation is this lane's only checkpoint. It renders no storyboard, so there's nowhere else to fix who says which line before you've paid for the render.
What are the cards above their heads?
The claims the script makes, after checking. Grounding is on for this format, so a claim that doesn't survive the check doesn't make it onto a card.
Can I pick the two characters?
Yes, from the cast picker. Each one carries its own voice, which is why this lane has no separate narrator setting the way the narrated formats do.
Why is there no music?
It's off by default on purpose. The format is two voices over a gameplay bed, and a music track under both of them muddies the voices and the bed at once. You can switch it on in the editor.
How long should one be?
About 90 seconds. The objection-and-correction structure needs three to five rounds to feel like it went somewhere, and the format's own reference corpus sits between 62 and 125 seconds.
Are the characters real people?
No. They're flat cartoon sprites generated as a cut-out sheet, deliberately flat rather than cinematic so they key cleanly off the green backdrop.
Other formats, same pipeline.
Give it something worth arguing about.
150 credits land at signup, with no card to enter. That's about three 90-second reels, and you read the conversation before any of them render.
Start free